There’s an enormous aspect of art that I think, while prevalent in everything from graphic arts to music, is almost always overlooked when it comes to film. This aspect would be “interpretation.” Allow me to explain: in music, although we could argue endlessly about what constitutes “good music,” a song is usually written about a certain experience, thought, or feeling from the songwriter’s point of view. The song, whether good or bad, is usually written in such a way that it is either greatly generalized or overly vague so that it’s meaning is “up for interpretation.” Basically, as I’m sure you know, that means that pretty much anyone who listens to that particular song can find a way to relate the lyrics of the song to their own experiences, thoughts, and feelings. It’s a beautiful thing, and in my opinion, the whole idea and the whole point of art should be to create something that is constructed in a way that it provokes this kind of personal response in people’s minds, no matter what medium you utilize.
While this whole idea of personal interpretation is still an important part in pretty much every artistic medium out there, the one place that I feel that it’s slowly slipped away from is in film. Once people got used to whole idea of “motion pictures” in the early 1900’s, surrealism and expressionism in the movies slowly started to take hold. However, as we’ve moved into modern eras of film, somehow hardcore realism has taken the forefront in mainstream media. Actually, I should backtrack and say that it’s the illusion of realism that has taken the forefront, because if a movie was completely like real life, no one would have any interest in it.
While I can see that there is a place for realism in film and a certain entertaining quality to it, it just seems to me that we’re missing out on the vast capabilities of visual art. We are now more equipped than ever before to use a visual medium to simulate and provoke certain feelings and to convey the emotions and abstract images in our heads in a way that they make sense to others, or in a way that others can make sense of them in their own way.
It seems like nearly every mainstream movie that has come out in the past few decades has been done completely by-the-book. By that, I mean that there are a handful of plots that are constantly recycled, and every time, each of these plots has a very specific purpose and a specific idea that they are trying to get across. In no way am I condemning the use of film to express your opinions (or, put simply, to propagandize). I’m guilty of it myself. It just feels to me that, for a long time, the film industry has ignored individuality on some level.
When I go to see a movie, I’m taking into the theater my own personal emotional baggage, for lack of a better description. Maybe I’m overly stressed and I’m looking to escape from reality for an hour or two. Maybe I’m working on literally dozens of projects at once and I need to take a break and focus my mind on one particular thing to ground myself. Maybe I don’t have a care in the world and I’m looking for something to cure me of my boredom. All of these are frequent mindsets that I settle into before immersing myself in a movie, and depending on which one I’m currently in, the experience of watching that movie could be completely different for me. That could mean I have a certain thought or emotion that resounds in my head after viewing it, or it could mean that I’ve devised my own interpretation of what the movie meant to me.
It’s that sense of individuality, the idea that the purpose of a film is more than just your own agenda and that each person’s own unique experience is what it’s all about, that’s sadly missing from the movie world today.












